User talk:Darthfyer86

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Darthfyer86, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Versus22_talk 11:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		I, Frankie Goh, give you The Original Barnstar for your hardwork on W-League 2008-09 related articles. Frankie goh (talk) 05:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Queensland Roar W-League squad 2009 W-League championship

Template:Queensland Roar W-League squad 2009 W-League championship has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. – Pee Jay 22:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Caitlin Foord

The article Caitlin Foord has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable footballer who fails WP:ATHLETE. Possibly recreate when made professional debut?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 20:57, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brooke Starrett

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Brooke Starrett. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Rettetast (talk) 09:51, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Brisbane Roar W-League season 2009, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 13:10, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 A-League Grand Final lineup

Hi. I was wondering if I would be able to request a lineup image for the 2009 A-League Grand Final as you seem to be very good at them and I'm not sure how to go about creating one. Thanks, timsdad ^(talk) 11:26, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Newcastle United Jets FC W-League managers

Template:Newcastle United Jets FC W-League managers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 14:41, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WNBL 2009-10 Position Ladder

Template:WNBL 2009-10 Position Ladder has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ashleigh Connor

The article Ashleigh Connor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Never made her pro debut, failing WP:NFOOTBALL; also fails WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 00:30, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashleigh Connor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashleigh Connor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashleigh Connor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 13:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WLeague NUJ

Template:WLeague NUJ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mentoz86 (talk) 10:23, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hayley Abbott

The article Hayley Abbott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this footballer meets WP:GNG or has played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 17:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC) {{subst:prodwarning|1=Jodie Bain|concern=Doesn't satisfy WP:NFOOTBALL guideline as W-League isn't fully professional, according to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues#Women.27s leagues 2. No other significant coverage found to meet GNG.}} The-Pope (talk) 02:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Central Coast Mariners FC W-League 2008-09 squad

Template:Central Coast Mariners FC W-League 2008-09 squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 01:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Central Coast Mariners FC W-League squad

Template:Central Coast Mariners FC W-League squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SuperJew (talk) 07:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Central Coast Mariners FC W-League head coaches

Template:Central Coast Mariners FC W-League head coaches has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SuperJew (talk) 07:11, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WNBL Ladder

Template:WNBL Ladder has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:28, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:A-League confirmed expansion map

Template:A-League confirmed expansion map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jodie Bain

The article Jodie Bain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORTS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 08:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:W-League club

Template:W-League club has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brooke Starrett

The article Brooke Starrett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about non-notable semi-pro footballer

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 13:59, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kathryn Pryer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathryn Pryer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Pryer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 13:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Britt Simmons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Britt Simmons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britt Simmons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 19:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jodie Bain

The article Jodie Bain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 08:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jodie Bain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jodie Bain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jodie Bain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 16:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Katie Daly

The article Katie Daly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

comprehensively fails WP:GNG and any relevant SNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 08:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lisa Hartley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Hartley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Hartley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 19:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emma Stewart for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma Stewart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Stewart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 14:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emma-Kate Dewhurst for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma-Kate Dewhurst is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma-Kate Dewhurst until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 14:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephanie Haim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephanie Haim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Haim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone 22:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen Roche (coach)

The article Stephen Roche (coach) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BASIC; has been tagged for notability for over 2 years. A WP:BEFORE search revealed routine news of him being appointed as coach for the two teams that he coached but no significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 23:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephen Roche (coach) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Roche (coach) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Roche (coach) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]